The Prince and the Political System free essay sample

This paper examines how Machiavelli viewed the political system, discussing what constitutes a successful leader, how to govern a nation and maintain strength and political power, no matter by what means, no matter what the cost. This paper discusses Niccolo Machiavellis famous work on how to governing, The Prince. The author examines Machiavellis beliefs regarding ones rise to power, and how to maintain such control. His theory, still practiced in modern times, states that a strong leader will do whatever he can to maintain power, use as much force and deception necessary, but only if for the absolute good of the people, not for his own personal benefit. Throughout The Prince, Machiavelli refers to virt?, or the characteristic that is needed in any great leader. He also says that Agathocles doesnt have this quality for the way in which he takes the power in Syracuse. Because of this, it is important to define virt? so that we can better determine if Agathocles act displays virt?. We will write a custom essay sample on The Prince and the Political System or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page Literally, virt? is Greek for manly excellence, but that is too vague and virtue as we know it today doesnt quite grasp the meaning used here either. Machiavelli seems to encompass a lot of personality traits into his definition of virtu.

veitnamess essays

veitnamess essays To many people, the name Vietnam means only one thing, a painful war in the 1960s and 1970s in which the American and South Vietnam soldiers fought against South Vietnamese rebels and North Vietnam. But the country of Vietnam is more then just its troubled past. It is a beautiful land, with rugged mountains, tumbling rivers, tropical beaches and lush fields of brilliant green rice. Vietnam has an ancient culture, rich with poets, scholars, artists, legends, and brave heroes. Most importantly, the Vietnamese are hard-working people, determined to survive and rebuild their country. Vietnams culture reaches back to Viet people who settled in northern Vietnam over two thousand years ago. Although many of todays customs and traditions are uniquely Vietnamese, several important features of the culture came from other places. The Chinese ruled Vietnam for hundreds of years and had great influence on its culture. The Vietnamese started following Chinese religions and used Chinese writhing symbols and medical practices. Through trade India also influence Vietnamese society. French rulers brought the European beliefs and customs. And during the war between the North and the South Vietnam, Americans also introduced their way of life to the Vietnamese. The official name for Vietnam is The Socialist Republic of Vietnam; witch consists of 40 provinces and three municipalities. Vietnam is a communist Country. The judicial system in Vietnam is based on the French Civil Code but modified to fit the Communist legal theory. Vietnams economy is predominantly agriculture. Rice cultivation alone accounts for 45% of the Gross National Product and 72% of the labour force. Vietnam has 71 million people (1995) and 85% are Vietnamese, only 2% of the population are Chinese. There are 60 different ethnic groups that make up the rest of Vietnams population. Vietnam is among the most densely populated country in the worl...

Corporate Social Responsibility Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2250 words - 1

Corporate Social Responsibility - Essay Example The main goal of creating internal business policies dedicated to advancing corporate social responsibility is to ensure that the organisation takes direct responsibility for regulatory compliance and encourage the production of positive outcomes that impact a diverse group of organisational stakeholders. There are some members of society that believe corporate social responsibility detracts from the organisation’s primary objective which, according to respected business theorist Milton Friedman (1970) is to advance attainment of profitability. Other societal stakeholders believe that CSR is a fundamental obligation of businesses to protect the interests of society whilst also maintaining a dependability and conscientiousness, thereby providing a valuable good to all stakeholders in society. This paper critically examines the conception of corporate social responsibility, its historical ramifications, and the potential future implications of contemporary CSR policy for busines s leaders. The historical context of CSR By the late 1800s and early 1900s, with the advancement of modern commercialism and production capacity with thriving industrial businesses, CSR took on a more modern context that did not focus specifically around God’s potential condemnation for failing to abide by ethical and moral principles. Andrew Carnegie, a 19th Century business philanthropist and an influential figure in expanding the prowess of the American steel industry, was a well-respected theorist who often publicly condemned businesses for seeking profitability as a primary goal whilst abandoning social welfare as a business objective. In 1868, Carnegie drafted a letter which stated, â€Å"amassing of wealth is one of the worst species of idolatry. There is no idol that is more debasing than the worship of money† (Klein 2004, p.57). The philanthropist philosophy of Carnegie (as well as several other 19th Century businesspersons) served as a foundation for opening new avenues for business leaders to seek moral and ethical business behaviour as a primary business objective, which laid the foundation for much of modern corporate social responsibility that guides contemporary business practices. From a regulatory perspective, in 1976 the United Nations, utilising the ethical support of many member nations, began establishing a rigorous and strict code of conduct for businesses that would serve as the modern foundation for corporate social responsibility (Asongu 2007). Further, in the 1980s, the pro-business Ronald Reagan presidential administration in the United States began to seek corporate deregulation in an effort to open new trade channels internationally and expand overall corporate profitability. What occurred was a short-term stalling on negotiations that would enhance the UN CSR contract for ethical and responsible business behaviour as businesses sought to expand their domestic operations across the globe, thereby exploiting cheap labo urers and a wide variety of negligent environmental standards. The stalling of long-standing corporate codes of responsibility changed after the post-September 11 attacks on the World Trade Center which again put ethical and moral behaviours into the proverbial spotlight, giving such groups as Amnesty International and the